1.Phytochemicals Discussion .2.Foods and Cancer Prevention Essay

1.Phytochemicals Discussion .2.Foods and Cancer Prevention - Essay Example A group of phytochemicals are collectively called Flavonoids. These are compounds with varied chemical structures present in fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds. The major flavonoid categories are flavonols, flavones, catechins, flavanones and anthocyanins. The main dietary sources of these compounds are tea, onions, soy and wine. The main flavonoid in onions is quercetin glucoside and the main flavonoid in tea is quercetin rutinoside. Flavonoid intake has been inversely linked with coronary heart disease in the Zutphen Elderly Study, the Seven Countries Study and a cohort study in Finland all of which have been reviewed and accepted by the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and American Heart Association – both organizations that are highly credible. Also, the incidence of ovarian cancer may be reduced with increased consumption of dietary flavonoids, according to researchers from Brigham and Womens Hospital and the Harvard School of Public Health. The study looked at food intake surveys and ovarian cancer data from 66,384 participants in the Harvard Nurses Health Study, which collected health data from 121,700 women over a period of 30 years. This is the first prospective analysis of flavonoid intake and ovarian cancer incidence. (in Donovan, 2004) According to the article by Steinmetz and Potter (1996), there have been several studies trying to establish a relationship between vegetable and fruit consumption with the risk of cancer. After having compared the studies, it was established that the perceived benefits of eating vegetables and fruits especially with cancer protection was consistent in the studies. Asides from these, there are also associated benefits including protection against cardiovascular disease, diabetes, stroke, obesity, diverticulosis, and cataracts. A raw carrot (per 100 grams of edible portion) contain: Water 88g; Protein 1.0g; Total lipid

Fashion changes in the American popular culture of the 1960s Research Paper

Fashion changes in the American popular culture of the 1960s - Research Paper Example The essay "Fashion changes in the American popular culture of the 1960s" discusses what changes happened in fashion in the America of 60th. The 1960s decade dawned the smiley face that appeared on almost everything including T-shirts. Characteristically, the smiley face gained more fame in the latter 1960s. The T-shirts and other items also had paintings of phrases of iconic events that epitomized the decade. The phrases included, â€Å"Martin Luther King†, â€Å"Civil Rights and Riots†, â€Å"The Space Race†, â€Å"Cuban Missile and Crisis†, â€Å"The Space Race† and â€Å"Vietnam. The term â€Å"hippie† derived from the word hipster. The hippies mainly represented an outgrowth from the Beat movement of the 1950s. The hippies often claimed to be aiming at freedom and re-embracing nature. They, therefore, represented an alternative interest in lifestyle as well being rebellious of the society that appeared to be repressive and conformist. Th e hippies made their clothing from natural fibers such as cotton and hemp. They also liked their clothing to be loose. Both men and women kept long hair with fussy styling, and they avoided hair products. They black trousers and turtlenecks worn by the female and male Beatniks metamorphosed into jeans and peasant blouses. Any hand-woven, hand sewn or hand knit macramà © soared in its prices. Gradually, the hippie fashion culture evolved into individuals dyeing their clothing. This colorful tie and dye fashion gain popularity almost immediately. In the fashion of the 60’s dressing appearance revolved.

Comparison Of Thoughts Between Plato And Machiavelli Philosophy Essay

Comparison Of Thoughts Between Plato And Machiavelli Philosophy Essay An ancient discussion in individual olden times is what to perform through rule as well as what is considered to be the finest method to control. Who must boast authority, in what way must an individual control, and which is the best reason for regime supply have constantly existed queries within the front inside society, as well as other than one time have flashed disagreement and argument. The vital fundamentals of statute have sited the individual necessitate for regulation and construction next to the personal aspiration for liberty, and negotiating among them both has by no means existed simply. This is an issue which is well thought-out and disagreed till these days. On the other hand, the disagreement has not reprieved exclusively through armed forces supremacies or officials, however theorists in addition. Two well-known says within these discussions that are Plato and Machiavelli, in cooperation of who had extremely diverse thoughts of regimes function inside the existences of its citizens. On behalf of Plato, the indispensable roles the regime should give are the allowance for its people to be in this world within their appropriate habitats. In addition, Platos rule strengthens necessitates on behalf of arrangement although providing the false impression of sovereignty. Nevertheless, Machiavelli suggested to facilitate regimes most important apprehension is to stay behind integral, by this means protecting constancy for the citizens that survive beneath it. The elements where both theorists contribute to be which they challenge to cooperate among constancy and liberty, also in the procedure declare which neither can be able of survival completely included. Platos beliefs of regime perceive the State as a superior description of the human being, and the spirit of a human being is encompassed of three components. He verifies that these three components comprise the desire, the courage, and motive, and these fractions contain objectives and aspirations which relate solitary to them. As an illustration, reason discovers accomplishment in the learning of the Forms, otherwise crucial magnificence that may be capable of merely to recognize in the course of the intelligence. The courage locates appearance in touching provisions, like antagonism, happiness, and depression. The enthusiasm is apprehensive by means of the tracking down of physical enjoyment. This feature of the spirit is fulfilled solitary by the mortal reassures for example like foodstuff, sex, and drink. These three components are initiated in the human being, nevertheless in unstable amounts. Several will bend over other to the desire, despite the fact so as to further be sole- motivated, and at a halt additionally discover superior completion throughout the academic searches of cause. Plato without a doubt supports the cause within his three element spirit, given that it is by means of cause which one be able to snatch the Forms, which they are the crucial in attractiveness and reality. Near this conclusion, the State, similar to the human being, includes three components which match up to the components of the being spirit. The lowest of the divisions is the desire that is encompassed of the ordinary beings. These may be specialists, manual workers, and cultivators that achieve the unskilled responsibilities necessary to the performance of the State. Individuals that create this division of the State are most excellent departed to their personal procedures, to benefit from and chase animal and matter enjoyments, for the reason that they are not proficient of grasp the Forms. The following level, the soul, would be consisted of armed forces. It is the def ense forces that have a minor distinguishing of the Forms, nevertheless not sufficient of one toward allowing cause to utter their procedures. Territorial armies struggle to the fatality to protect the State for the reason that their emotional lashes to it. However, Plato recommends that the regime elevate broods, in that way constructing the State a familiar mother to all. In conclusion, explanation encompasses the uppermost division of the state, and from this place, thinkers and head of states come out. These are the persons that are not attracted in material enjoyment or emotional connections. Head of states and theorists are engaged with the revision of the Forms for the reason that they are capable of nearly all willingly to seize them. This perceptive of the definitive superior consent to the survival of male and female rulers, those are able to control above the soul and the desire and guarantee that the State continues in its appropriate operational category. Plato visions the good regime surrounds partitions that may be observed as a kind of classism. Every human being is born into a fussy fraction, or division, surrounded by the State and its found in that fraction which they will exist in it intended for living. In order to highlight on the spot, Plato places into view the anecdote where human beings are beard with metal, sculpture, silver, or gold inside their spirits. Gold is assorted into the spirits of theorists and leaders, silver in the spirits of the military, while iron and bronze are found in the spirits of cultivators and craftsmen. For the guarantee of the poorer rank that does not seek to control or manage, or that the managers are not attracted for the animal/substance happiness of the desire, he says in his tale that the mainly significant authority from the divinity to the leaders is that there is not anything which they have to protect in an enhanced way otherwise observe more cautiously than the combination of metals in the essence of the upcoming born. Therefore if every human being recognizes what his position with respect to the metal in their spirits, subsequently nearby will be no rebellion by the people or conquest by the armed forces. Every single one will recognize their appropriate positions and be satisfied in them, and the regime will operate in agreement. On the other hand, and in comparison with Plato, Machiavelli suggests a viewpoint of ruling which is to some extent comparable to Plato in character, but is extremely have a large singular in accomplishment. Machiavellis answer distress is steadiness of the regime. A steady regime is the finest possibility to tolerate, and to maintain the masses pleased. A steady regime in addition supplies the most excellent benefits of the populace that obey it. Finally, Machiavelli proposes that a leader of state watches in opposition to being commonly unloved by his matters. Furthermore, he believes it is intelligent in favor of a sovereign to exist surrounded by his themes, in the core to recognize who they are and what they desire from their state. Where he and Plato appear to be from the similar views so as to if any can keep the common population pleased, afterward no main troubles or intimidation will face the regime. Nevertheless, Plato prà ©cised that just definite forms of people are abl e of suiting philosopher the king, while Machiavelli says that everyone that have the force to obtain authority and the capital is capable of doing it. A key to attain control and maintain it is by having the hold up of individuals that one will be controlling. If the community is commonly satisfied with their regime, no one will propose for a new-fangled method or form of ruling, or an innovative monarch. In this element, Machiavelli recommends that people that become heir to their authority for example like the ancestors who law governments in excess of a extensive time, have a greatly effortless instance of maintaining it. The memoirs where the inhabitants encompass of the leaders relatives will be the flattering individuals, supplied so as to the ruling people has indulgenced its issues fine historically. This will clearly support the recently caped rulers that will rule, ever since he doesnt have to emphasize authority during vigorous accomplishments alongside with the citizens. We can see clearly here the consequences of a steady regime, where the population doesnt fright from fresh or insensitive leader pending to authority f or the reason that they have acquaintances with the ruling people. In occurrences where a person approaches to control the state or regime during aggressive strength, despite the fact that, the condition of maintaining authority is greatly further complex. The regime has previously been frightened into insecurity for the reason that it was and still deposed, were the citizens that previously existed in this condition, might nearly all be challenging to the alteration. As a result of no resources does Machiavelli consider that the regime is by no means constructed during aggressive ways. In truth, Machiavelli sets down three techniques through which a sovereign that grasps supremacy preserve to preserve it subsequent to such procedures. The sovereign is capable of, first arrange the town to devastate, second is to survive in the town and surrounded by the populace that the ruler will be ruling, third, is to construct a selected category which will stay faithful to the head of state a t the same time permitting the population to keep on existing underneath their previous commandments. Once more, the fundamental concern is the constancy of the regime. Nevertheless, he considers that citizens that bear in mind the previous traditions of living and of regime will be the nearly all hazardous to a recently recognized shape of ruling. This is in particular correct of folks that one time existed in a status of freedom. In his vision, the merely method to preserve authority in those circumstances is to demolish the town and disperse its native population. An additional technique is to construct the best ranks that are faithful to the head of state. This category will be a protector in opposition to pressures to the leaders influence for the reason that it was produced by the head of state. If supremacy alters from to another, in that case individuals building up this division will drop their selected rank, or still their existences. In this situation of those citizens th at had been under the rule of a realm, the arranged technique intended to maintain authority is diverse. An individual is obliged to get rid of the leftovers of the previous controlling rank for example the removed noble family and fundamentally exist between the citizens. Ultimately the public will disregard the earlier leader and surrender to the fresh leaders power, afforded the latest sovereign that is suspicious with reference to turn into a despised body. Nevertheless the creation of constancy in several regimes is the input for guaranteeing that one is capable of preserving control. The means to launching solidity in the regime, after that, is to carry on individuals that are existing as a authorized happily. Some of the significant differences flanked by Machiavellis viewpoint of supervision and Platos, is simply the function of the public. However, Plato desires to maintain the people in their positions and create an arrangement for the State in the course of classism. Alternatively, Machiavelli has greatly fewer fears in support of arrangement than Plato for solidity, and a pleased public are steady. Machiavelli moves to propose with the aim of a sovereign to support the nation, for after a leader makes that, the citizens arms turn into the rulers own (p. 457). In addition, Machiavelli shapes a head of state that defends the nation will perpetually gain their shore up and faithfulness, and which the performance entails a type of faith flanked by the leader and the themes. On the other hand, Plato might create merely one precise rank for it being the equipped guardians for the State. Conversely, Machiavelli might construct a combating power where a person that appears experienced to use a gun might do so (p. 457). However even further discussion of the distinction among these two theorists is the reality so as to Machiavelli considers where everyone is able to get higher to authority. Machiavelli utters that a citizen-ruler may go up through distinction in a reason of any of the two circumstances are got together. One situation which is the head of state has the support of the public, and this back up might to a great extent is because that the leader is an individual in his nation. However, the further situation is that the head of state is eminent for this position due to the the favor of the elite (p. 438). Nevertheless, the sovereign located in control by the leaders features a complex duty of grasping that place. The leaders that place a leader in control frequently feels of there selves as his colleagues, moreover will accordingly not follow a person they perceive as if he is as of the identical sort. Additionally, Machiavelli utters so as to the aims of the selected ones, at the time contrasted to the public, are further dissolute for the reason that they desire for domination. The citizens dont hope to tyrannize, however slightly looks for the avoidance of domination. As a consequence, a leader that tries to gather the aims of the rulers will fundamentally have a critical standing, as well as to discover themselves bordered by the public which wont act upon. In comparing the two authors, one preserves to observe an essential foundation that is done for the perfect regime. Platos structure of the regime is connected to classism, by maintaining the citizens where ever they are and making their tasks which are perfectly matched to them. With respect to this point of view, the citizens will cheer merely for the reason that they are making what they want to make at best. The ordinary citizens are acting as the tough workers and coddling in physically enjoyments, together of which are the entire that is able to wish to comprehend. The armed forces struggle in favor of their home town for the reason that the State has turn out to be a type of relatives or blood relation. The armed forces struggle for the reason of protecting the accessory, and as a consequence of struggling on sensation. The heads of state in Platos State, including guardians, implement their influence in the form of the maximum consideration of the structures, and as a result of the definitive certainty, which is by any means achievable. On the other hand, Machiavellis observation of the regime is entrenched extremely profound in certainty, on the other hand, in addition to it, this entails that constancy is simply considered to be the best solution to a permanent method controlling. On condition that the masses do not suffer that they are in danger of course in a situation of removing their properties from them as well as their belongings, however the people will be prepared for surrender to their leader. As soon as the citizens are permitted to walk off among their existence not including the concern of a fresh government grasping supremacy or squashing their civil liberties and pinching their properties, they are able to survive in a situation of satisfaction as well as pleasure. Seeing the publics job in the regime, a person is able to encompass a force on the plan of authority in a condition that they are familiar with what how should they act and e ncompass the backup in order to perform it. Authority is not limited for a specific category of citizens or else a division, nevertheless is there for someone to take it specifically for the bravest to snatch it. As per Machiavelli, the citizens are further presently an accumulation that should be alienated and positioned appropriately, although an influential power which have to be measured and appreciated by the person that might control the state. Except in cooperation with the two philosophers, the regime appears to be an essential as well as an ordinary condition beneath which civilization have the power to function and continue to exist.

Essay on Spiritual Poverty in James Joyces Dubliners -- Dubliners Es

Spiritual Poverty Exposed in The Dubliners  Ã‚   Joyce describes the spiritual poverty of the people of Dublin in the industrial age, with powerful images of mechanized humans and animated machines. In "After the Race" and "Counterparts" he delineates characters with appropriate portraits of human automation. Machines seize human attributes and vitality in opposition to the vacuous citizens of Ireland's capitalist city. Joyce's use of metaphorical language brings to life the despair of his country. In Winesburg, Ohio, Sherwood Anderson writes an allegorical account of the failure of mankind (1919). Although Anderson depicts rural life in the "New World," his understanding of human nature and descriptive terminology provide a valuable framework for examining Joyce's rendition of urban misery in the "Old World." "The Book of the Grotesque," the opening piece of Anderson's short story collection, animates the thoughts of a dying old man: It was his notion that the moment one of the people took one of the truths to himself, called it his truth, and tried to live his life by it, he became a grotesque and the truth he embraced became a falsehood. (24, Penguin Edition). This notion, that belief in a single truth or paradigm distorts people such that they become warped and can no longer function as human, is central to Joyce's characterizations of the Dubliners. Twentieth Century Homo sapiens can be distinguished from machines by their potential to think openly and consider myriad ideas without being paralyzed by a singular absolute. When people clutch an idea and transform it into an ideal, the separation between man and machine becomes blurred. Human automatons mechanically follow the programming of their truth. In "A... ... demands that he find an outlet for his frustration, and he beats his child to slake the strange thirst for violence of an alcoholic. When an individual seizes a single idea or paradigm they loose their humanity and assume the form of a grotesque machine. Joyce's characterizations of mechanical people and animate machines in The Dubliners follow this philosophy as presented by Sherwood Anderson, and reinforce its applicability. Dubliners are anesthetized by their truths and experience a paralysis of their human possibilities. Only dull machinery remains. This machinery is then capable of great inhumanity as it follows the scripture of its truth. Alcoholics can beat children, Capitalists can ravage countries, and Nationalists can fight wars (religious or profane) to exterminate other ethnicities. Works Cited: Joyce, James Dubliners, New York:Penguin, 1993.

Psychology & Understanding Human Behavior: the Individual

Psychology & Understanding Human Behavior: The Individual PSYC120-1203B-06 Introduction to Psychology IP5 Psychology & Understanding Human Behavior: The Individual President Barak Obama is who I have chosen to do my research and analysis on for this class as he is one of the most controversial people that I can think of today. With him being the President of the United States he is known all over the world. After being the President for almost four years a lot of what he has done in office has really upset a lot of people by him going against what the Presidents before him had worked so hard to establish.This country was built on Christian principles by our founding fathers and it seems that this country in the last 4 years has strayed very far from where it was and should be. With that being said I chose him because I wanted to delve into his childhood and his upbringing to see what if anything may have caused him to become who is known to be today. Barack Hussein Obama, ll was born August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, Hawaii. He is the older of two children. Barack is what you would consider bi-racial individual. His father’s name is Barack Obama, Sr. and he is African American. His mother’s name is Ann Dunham and she is from an English ancestry mixed with Scottish, German, Swiss, and Irish cultural backgrounds. His parents met when they were students at the University of Hawaii in 1960 in a Russian class. Barack’s father was a foreign student who was attending the college on a scholarship. His mother was originally from Wichita, Kansas. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor her father, Stanly enlisted in the service, and her mom got a job on the bomber assembly line.When the war ended her parents bought a house through the Federal Housing Program and finally after many moves the family ended up living in Hawaii. His parents got married on February 2, 1961 however they separated when his father went to Harvard University on scholarship and eventually the couple divorced in 1964 (Main article: Early Life and Career of Barack Obama). His mom later remarried an Indonesian man name Lolo Soetoro who was attending college in Hawaii as well. From the age of six until the age of ten Barack lived in a city called Jakarta where his younger sister Maya Soetoro Ng was born.In 1971 after being scared for her son’s life on several occasions and wanting him to get a good education, Ann decided to send her son to Hawaii to stay with his grandparents, Madelyn and Stanley Armour Dunham. He gained a scholarship under his grandparents’ guidance and attended a private preparatory school where he was one of three blacks. He started there in the fifth grade excelling in basketball. It was at that school when he became attentive to racism and what it meant being a black man. However, that did not keep him from graduating with honors in 1979.His mother was there to see his progress until having to leave in 1977 to go back and work in Indon esia as an anthropological field worker. She did however return back to Hawaii in 1994, but in 1995 she passed away from ovarian cancer. He struggled though with the fact of his father being absent from his life who he saw only once after his parents divorced for a short visit. At the age of 22 he learned that his father who had lost his legs in a previous car accident had now lost his life due to a car accident in Nairobi.After finishing high school, Obama took classes at Occidential College in Los Angeles for two years, and then later transferred to Columbia University in New York. Receiving his degree in 1983 from Columbia in political science and working in the business sector for two years, he moved to Chicago. He was involved in the communities, and started working on the South Side as a community organizer for low-income residents in the Roseland and the Altgeld Gardens Community. He also during this time joined the Trinity United Church of Christ even though he admitted that he wasn’t raised in a religious home.He also visited his relatives in Kenya as well as the graves of his father and paternal grandfather. Obama said that during his visits to these graves, â€Å"I saw that my life in America—the black life, the white life, the sense of abandonment I felt as a boy, the frustration and hope I'd witnessed in Chicago—all of it was connected with this small plot of earth an ocean away. † (2012, Biography. com) Upon his return from Kenya he entered Harvard Law School in 1988. This would be the beginning of a great life for Barack.The very next year, he met Michelle Robinson who was an associate at Sidley & Austin law firm in Chicago. She was assigned to be his adviser during a summer internship at the firm, soon after that they began dating. After he completed law school he decided to return back to Chicago where he joined the law firm of Miner, Barnhill & Galland as civil rights lawyer. He also during this time taught at the University of Chicago Law School, and he also help organize the voter registration drives form Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign.On October 3, 1992 he married Michelle and they moved to Kenwood on Chicago’s South Side. In 1998 their first daughter Malia was born followed by another daughter Sasha who was born in 2001. Obama’s work as an advocate is what actually helped him propel his start in politics. He ran for the Illinois State Senate as a Democrat and won the election in 1996. During his time there he worked with both Democrats and Republicans in putting together a legislature on ethics, as well as expanding health care services and early childhood education for the poor. He also created the state earned-income tax for poor people.In 2000 he had an unsuccessful run for Democratic seat of the U. S. House of Representatives. Though this failure did not stop him from putting together a campaign committee in 2002 to raise funds for the 2004 U. S Senate race which he won by 70% in November 2004. This was the largest electoral victory in Illinois history and made him only the third African American to be elected to the U. S. Senate since its reconstruction. February 2007 he announced his candidacy for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination which put him in competition with Hilary Clinton who was then the Senator for New York.However, on June 3, 2008 he succeeded her and she gave her full support to his campaign. November 4, 2008 he defeated Republican candidate John McCain for the position of the U. S. President. On January 20, 2009, Barack Obama became the 44th President of the United States and the first African American to hold this office. The psychological perspective that I chose to discuss about Barack Obama was behavioristic. Reason being is because most people view behavioristic people as being controlled by their environment and think that they are the result of what they have learned from their environment.With that being said, Obama had what some would call a strike against him being that he was multiracial. With his mother being white and his father was being African American he was teased about his race and it was hard for him to fit in at times. Though he was considered a black man, he stayed with his grandparents and mother whom were Caucasian to the eye. Though being teased, he did his research and used it in his advantage. Both parents were smart, so he pretty much inherited their brains. His mother and father attended college, as well as his step-father.Barack excelled in school; he was a teacher, and a leader. Even though his environment was a tough one growing up Obama became a successful man who has accomplished more than most people in his 51 years. The Humanistic Psychology has its strengths and weaknesses. One of the strengths is that it shifts the focus of the behavior to the individual or whole person rather than the unconscious mind, genes and observable behavior etc. It also s atisfied most people’s idea of what being human means because it values personal ideals and self-fulfillment (McLeod, S. A. 2007). Carl Rogers believed that people have one basic motive, and that is the tendency to self-actualization. He believed that for a person to achieve self-actualization that they must be in a state of congruence. In other words he felt that when a person feels that they have become who they want to become and it is congruent with their actual behavior then they have achieved self-actualization (McLeod, S. A. , 2007). Maslow on the other hand felt that most people would never achieve this level which was his 5th level on his hierarchy of needs pyramid.He felt that in order for people to progress from level to level certain things needed to be met. In order to reach that 5th level you would need to fulfill the 1st through the 4th. These levels are the biological and psychological needs, safety needs, belongingness and love need with the 4th level being t he esteem needs (McLeod, S. A. , 2007). This theory’s weakness would be that with the basic concept behind the theory of being free will, it is difficult to both develop a treatment technique and study the effectiveness of this technique.While this theory may work for a simple issue, you wouldn’t use this approach to treat someone for something like schizophrenia. In conclusion what I have learned from psychology is that everyone is unique and we all tend to have our quirks. Will we ever understand everyone completely? Most likely not because being the humans that we are we change constantly. Our environment and the people we associate with play a tremendous part in who we are and in whom we become. Just like in the workplace, people come from all various walks of life working together in a small office like I do may or may not always get along.Can we use psychology to try an understand them? Sure, I believe that is possible, but you can only learn why an individual ac ts the way they do by being able study them from the beginning of their life to now. To be honest I find psychology a little stressful so for me to actually want to pursue it outside of this class and maybe do it at my workplace is kind of out of the question at this present moment. For me I will leave it up to the professionals who have decided that they want to spend their time dissecting people and their strange minds.One thing that psychology has taught me is that never to make a snap judgment on the way someone is behaving because there is always an underlying cause for their behavior. This is one thing that I will do my best not to do anymore at my workplace or life in general. You never know what one has been through or may be going through, so until you have that understanding never make an assumption and categorize them. The following statement, â€Å"you can’t understand others unless you understand yourself† to me does carry a lot of truth.The feedback that I have received from both my peers and my professor in this class has caused me to take a deeper look inside myself as a person. To see what others think of me by what I say or write has definitely been an eye opener. To see myself through another person’s eyes is what all of us should try to do on a daily basis with the people we are surrounded by. I was always told, â€Å"you don’t need to worry about what other people think of you† but sometimes you just can’t help but wonder what goes through someone’s mind when you walk into a room or say something to them.Psychology in itself does allow you to put on different lenses to see things about yourself and others in a different light. It is just like putting on different lenses on camera allows you to adjust how far away or how close you see things, psychology does just the same. One man named Same Gosling states in his article Mixed Signals on psychologytoday. com, â€Å"we think we know ourselves better than others do but yet we are biased when it comes to seeing ourselves in a good light that we become strangers to ourselves. In other words we need to take the time to listen to people when they do give us feedback on ourselves as it will help us in the long run and not just take it as jealous criticism. Honestly, I will never again allow myself to think that someone is criticizing me because they are jealous. Instead I will take what they say and allow myself to re-examine what I have said or done to cause them to think that way about me. We are all human and none of us regardless of what we think are perfect. We make mistakes just like everyone else. We say and do things to cause harm to others just as they do to us.However, if we just take a minute to see our behavior through their eyes then we might can understand ourselves better and in turn understand them as well. There are all kinds of psychology resources that we can utilize to help understand ourselves and the wor ld around us if we will just take the time to search them out. There are numerous self-help books in bookstores today, and there are plenty of resources on the web such as articles, personality tests, and more. We should do all we can to explore these resources to get a better understanding of our world.If you take a look at the world today there are a lot of hurt, angry, and confused people out there who no one seems to notice or care about. We have become a society that is so driven on a me, me, me attitude that the rest of the world seems to have faded away from our view. If we use what psychology has taught us to explore why people are hurt, angry, confused and acting the way they are then we might be able to help them get to the root of their issues and deal with them. Psychology to me is all about getting to the heart of the matter, finding the root cause and dealing with it.I say let’s stop medicating people, or covering things up and pretending it is all okay when it isn’t. Let’s use what psychology has taught us to try to understand people and why they act the way they do. In order to do that though, we have to start with ourselves in this process because how can we effectively help anyone if we can’t even help ourselves? References 1. Edwards, Roberta (2008). Barack Obama: United States President 2. Gosling, Sam (2009). Mixed Signals Retrieved from http://www. psychologytoday. com/articles/200908/mixed-signals 3. McLeod, S. A. (2007).Simple Psychology; Carl Rogers Retrieved from http://www. simplepsychology. org/carl-rogers. html 4. McLeod, S. A. (2007). Simple Psychology; Maslow | Hierarchy of Needs Retrieved from http://www. simplepsychology. org/maslow. html 5. McLeod, S. A. (2007). Simple Psychology; Humanism Retrieved from http://www. simplepsychology. org/humanistic. html 6. Mendell, David (2002). Obama: From Promise to Power. New York: Amistad/HarperCollins. ISBN 0-06-085820-6 7. Obama, Barack. (2012). Biography. co m. Retrieved 10:44, May 23, 20122 from http://biograpgy. com/people/baracl-obama-12782369

Forensic science

I went to JoAnn Fabrics to get a Slinky Science fingerprint science kit so I could use the powder and the feather from the box. The powder came in a bottle so it made it really hard to get prints and I actually had my boyfriend put prints on the things I listed so I could use the powder and the powder was also white and made it hard to see. When I used the feather it would smudge the print and I would have to try and use It a different direction.If I were to side to side with the feather It would smudge the print but if I would go up and down It would SSH the powder away so I was able to see the print better but not clearly. I did not find any prints In my apartment due to my boyfriend cleaning everything. This Is why I only find the prints I did because I asked him to put the prints there. Yes I could tell the difference between the prints If I were to put my print right next to It.My finger print has loops and my boyfriend's prints have tent arches on them. Some of the surfaces tha t I would think I would find prints on are door knobs, TV, the handle on a microwave, the keys to the car, the thermostat and light switches, books, cell phones ND you could also get prints off of duct tape and the door handles of a car that has metal handles and you can get prints off of garbage bags also and DVD cases.When I was doing this assignment I found that trying to get a print from surfaces that were clean was hard but you could see where It was wiped down and the smoother surfaces were harder because the powder would Just move around and would not suck to the surface all that well. I also noticed that using white powder was not all that great because you could hardly see the print and that would be why we use the lack powder to get fingerprints off of different surfaces. Juju By boosters print and I would have to try and use it a different direction. If I were to side to side with the feather it would smudge the print but if I would go up and down it would find any prints in my apartment due to my boyfriend cleaning everything. This is why the difference between the prints if I were to put my print right next to it. My finger clean was hard but you could see where it was wiped down and the smoother stick to the surface all that well. I also noticed that using white powder was not all